Immanuel Kant, but Immanuel Can

20140522-110309-39789631.jpg

The secular philosopher Immanuel Kant formulated the principle: “Since reason commands that such actions should take place, it must be possible for them to take place.” In other words, according to him, obligation proves ability, or an ought implies a can. I get the philosopher’s, “reason” based, sentiment… but I ask, is it Biblical that obligation proves ability or that an ought implies a can, when it comes to faith or repentance?

Before I address the question, did you catch the weakness in Kant’s postulate? Did you notice where he grounds his assertion? I hinted at it. Kant grounds his assertion upon his reason. In other words, his philosophical contribution is viciously circular. Kant validates his reason, with his reason. Such is the common error of secular thought, that secular thought is baseless because it’s not actually grounded. That aside, let’s take a look at how the Bible deals with the “ought implies a can” postulate.

Luke 17:5-6
“The apostles said to the Lord, “Increase our faith!” And the Lord said, “If you had faith like a grain of mustard seed, you could say to this mulberry tree, ‘Be uprooted and planted in the sea,’ and it would obey you.”

Is Jesus saying to the apostles that they have the ability themselves to conjure up faith? Nope. Does Jesus say, “Let’s go fellas, get your act together and trust more!”? Nope. He basically says, “If you had faith like blank, then you would be able to do blank.” There is no indication here from Jesus that the apostles have any ability on their own to improve their faith. Jesus just says that if they had a certain, minimal amount of faith, then the extraordinary would be possible.

So, where does our (Christians) measure of faith come from then?

Romans 12:3
“For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned.”

God assigns whatever measure of faith anyone has. It is not determined by obligation. This is in complete opposition to Immanuel Kant’s, secular postulate. In the Biblical realm, obligation does not necessarily imply ability. Kant asserts, in accord with vicious circularity, that in a universal sense, obligation implies ability. But, we have just read that God assigns the measure of one’s ability to trust. Obligation is not even part of the equation in determining one’s level of faith. Yet, we are all obligated to repent (mournfully acknowledge our sin) and to trust in Christ for salvation, regardless of our inability to do so.

But why?

Because whether or not we “can,” or whether or not we have the ability to repent or even trust, we still know better.

(See my recent blog which scripturally defends this point: A Responsibility vs. A Response Ability)

The point is, even if we (anyone who has ever lived) could fulfill the ultimate obligation (acquiescence to God), we still would never choose to fulfill the obligation (repent and trust).

Check out these sobering words from Paul:

Acts 17:30-31
“The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now He commands all people everywhere to repent, because He has fixed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by a Man whom He has appointed; and of this He has given assurance to all by raising Him from the dead.”

Romans 8:7-8
“For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God’s law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.”

Ephesians 2:8-9
“For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.”

God calls everyone to repent and to trust, even though none of us can do either. But, those who do were gifted such by God, so to even consider bragging about making a proper choice is blasphemy. Here’s Paul mentioning to Timothy that repentance is granted solely by God:

2 Timothy 2:23-26
“Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.”

Did you notice that repentance precedes the knowledge of the truth? Our job as Christians is to proclaim the ought, to proclaim what it is that needs to be responded to (the truth of who Christ is and what He did). God determines whether or not the notion of ought can and will be embraced by the people we share it with. Immanuel Kant expresses a foolish controversy, and we must be careful of getting into debates over such things, as though such postulates are valid. Not only is the idea posed by Kant invalid because it is grounded in human reason, but the view on its own is antithetical to scripture. In other words, it’s not only ungrounded, it’s false.

God commands the unattainable in order to demonstrate to man that man cannot attain what only God can attain. In other words, the proper response from man to God’s command to repent and trust is, “I admit that I cannot attain what You command and I am remorseful that I cannot (repentance). Therefore, I will trust (put my faith in) in You God (Jesus Christ) to attain it for me.” However, no man will ever answer God’s command in such a way unless God touches such a man’s heart first.

No command from God is attainable by man alone. Only God can fulfill His commands. For a man to think that he can fulfill any of God’s commands on his own, is a belief of the highest order of arrogance. Such is what Kant promotes.

Matthew 1:23
“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son,
and they shall call His name Immanuel”
(which means, God with us).”

I did a play on words for the title of this blog: “Immanuel Kant, but Immanuel Can”.

The point being:

Immanuel Kant (Immanuel Kant can’t: just as none of us can), but Immanuel Can (only Jesus Christ can fulfill our obligation).

That’s the Gospel.

We (Christians) must always remind ourselves that our believing in Christ is not the work of ourselves. It is the work of Christ:

John 6:28-29
“Then they said to Him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent.”

The best response to God’s commands is the full admittance that we can’t (apart from Christ), even though we all know that we are obligated to do so.

Mark 9:24
“Immediately the father of the child cried out and said, “I believe; help my unbelief!””

Godspeed, to the brethren!

FOLLOW theidolbabbler.com ON TWITTER!!

One thought on “Immanuel Kant, but Immanuel Can”

Comments are closed.