My question:
Putting aside all atonement theories, because they are not really talked about in the Bible, isn’t what the atonement or the sacrifice of Jesus about doing everything Leviticus used to do for Israel, but this time He does it for the world and it’s not temporal, it’s permanent?
ChatGPT response:
Yes — if we bracket later atonement theories and just ask what the biblical storyline itself presents, your summary is actually very close to the narrative logic that runs from Leviticus into the New Testament.
Let me frame it carefully in biblical categories rather than systematic theology language.
1) What Leviticus actually accomplished for Israel
If we describe Leviticus in functional terms (not later models), its sacrifices did three main things:
A. Cleansing / decontamination
Sin and impurity polluted sacred space (Lev 16; Lev 17:11).
Sacrifice restored ritual cleanliness.
👉 Goal: Yahweh can remain present among the people.
B. Reopening access
After cleansing, Israel could:
draw near (קרב / qarav)
enter worship
remain in covenant presence
This is the pattern you’ve noticed repeatedly:
cleansing → access → summons to approach
(Isa 44:22; Lev 9; Ps 24; etc.)
C. Ongoing but temporary maintenance
Leviticus was:
cyclical repetitive
Israel-specific
tied to sacred geography
Hebrews explicitly says the system had to be repeated continually.
2) What the NT says Jesus accomplished — in biblical language
When the NT talks without later theory grids, it describes Jesus doing for the world what Leviticus did for Israel — but at a different scale.
Notice the continuity:
Hebrews
Jesus:
cleanses the heavenly sanctuary (Heb 9:23–26)
removes barriers to approach (Heb 10:19–22)
does it once for all rather than annually
The language is overwhelmingly Levitical, not philosophical.
2 Corinthians 5:19–20
God has already:
reconciled the world not counting trespasses
Then comes the invitation:
“be reconciled.”
That is structurally identical to Israel’s summons after cleansing.
John / Revelation themes
Jesus:
takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29)
makes a kingdom of priests from all nations (Rev 5:9–10)
Which sounds like Leviticus universalized.
3) So is it correct to say:
Jesus accomplished everything Leviticus did — but globally and permanently?
Broadly, yes — with a few clarifications.
✅ Continuity: Same kind of accomplishment
The NT consistently portrays Jesus as:
the final purification
the ultimate access-opening event
the priestly fulfillment
Not a different category of act, but a scaled-up fulfillment.
You could describe it like this:
Leviticus: Israel’s sanctuary cleansed
Jesus: Cosmic/heavenly sanctuary cleanse
Leviticus: Access reopened repeatedly
Jesus: Access opened permanently
Leviticus: Israel invited to draw near
Jesus: World invited to draw near
Leviticus: Temporary ritual system
Jesus: Once-for-all priestly act
✅ Expansion: From Israel → World
This fits your larger “kingdom of priests” motif.
Israel functioned as:
a prototype priestly people (Exod 19:6)
Jesus extends that priestly access outward:
Gentiles now included (Eph 2:13–18)
One new humanity with shared access.
So yes — narratively, it looks like:
Levitical access logic → universalized through Christ.
✅ Permanence instead of temporality
Hebrews contrasts:
repeated animal offerings vs a single decisive priestly act.
The emphasis is not “legal payment theory,” but finality:
no more ritual resets needed.
4) Where I would nuance your wording slightly
Your instinct is strong, but I’d refine one phrase:
“doing everything Leviticus used to do”
Not everything in a one-to-one mechanical sense — because:
Leviticus regulated covenant life inside Israel
Jesus’ work inaugurates new-creation priesthood
So rather than replacement, think:
Fulfillment + expansion + transformation.
5) A very biblical way to summarize your insight
Here’s a formulation that stays close to Scripture’s own categories:
Jesus accomplishes the definitive purification that Leviticus symbolized — opening enduring access to God, not for Israel alone but for the world, and inviting humanity into permanent priestly nearness.
Notice:
no later atonement model required
just storyline continuity.
6) Why your reading actually fits the NT’s narrative flow
When you read NT texts through Leviticus rather than later debates, several things line up:
“Draw near” language explodes after Hebrews.
Reconciliation is proclaimed as already accomplished (2 Cor 5).
Humanity is summoned into priestly access rather than merely declared legally adjusted.
Which resonates strongly with how you’ve been framing:
access restored → invitation to approach → allegiance response.
It makes me think of this:
Hebrews 9:15 (HCSB)
Therefore, He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called might receive the promise of the eternal inheritance, because a death has taken place for redemption from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.
Godspeed, to the brethren!
Check out my book!
theidolbabbler.com 