My question:
In the Hebraic mind, if the life (nephesh) is in the blood and blood being poured out is the means of which the life returns to the dust, then it must also be the thinking that the life then goes to Sheol as the blood drains into the ground because it is thought that Sheol is below the ground. If I am correct, then Sheol in the Hebraic mind is the holding place of those who die, making the destruction of Sheol in Revelation to be quite significant, because with Sheol destroyed in the age to come there is no longer a place where the dead are. Everyone is then either alive for eternity in the next age or simply non-existent?
ChatGPT response:
Yes—with one important refinement. I think the broad trajectory you are seeing fits Hebrew biblical anthropology quite well, but I would not make the blood physically draining into the earth the mechanism by which the nephesh “travels” to Sheol. The biblical images overlap, but the texts don’t explicitly connect them that mechanically.
Leviticus says:
“The **nephesh of the flesh is in the blood.” (Lev 17:11; cf. 17:14)
And Genesis establishes the complementary earthward movement:
“You are dust, and to dust you shall return.” (Gen 3:19)
So when blood is poured out, the creature’s embodied life is being surrendered. The living nephesh ceases to be a living nephesh as the body returns to the earth. That fits Ecclesiastes 3:19–20: humans and animals die, and “all are from the dust, and to dust all return.”
Where Sheol fits
Sheol is strongly associated with downward movement into the earth:
- Jacob expects to “go down to Sheol” (Gen 37:35).
- Korah and his company “go down alive into Sheol,” as the earth opens (Num 16:30–33).
- Job describes Sheol as the destination from which one does not return to ordinary life (Job 7:9–10).
- Psalm 30:3 parallels being brought “up from Sheol” with being restored from “the Pit.”
- Psalm 88 repeatedly connects Sheol, the grave, the Pit, darkness, and the realm of the dead.
So I think your instinct is sound if stated this way:
Sheol is not primarily another world where the real human continues living after escaping the body. It is the biblical realm/state/domain of the dead—the destination of humans who have gone down into death.
That’s particularly important because nephesh itself can be spoken of in relation to Sheol. Psalm 16:10 says:
“You will not abandon my nephesh to Sheol.”
Likewise Psalm 89:48 asks:
“What man can live and never see death?
Who can deliver his nephesh from the power of Sheol?”
Notice the conceptual contrast: living versus being under the power of Sheol. The hope is not ultimately that an immortal component escapes Sheol but that God delivers from Sheol/death.
And that makes Revelation 20 remarkably significant
This is where I think your observation becomes especially strong.
Revelation 20:13–14 says that:
“Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them…”
and then:
“Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire.”
Hades here functions as the Greek conceptual counterpart to Sheol. And notice what happens: the realm of the dead is emptied before it is destroyed.
That sequence matters:
Death → dead held by Death/Hades → resurrection → judgment → Death/Hades destroyed.
Then immediately afterward, Revelation 21:4 explains the consequence:
“Death shall be no more.”
That fits extraordinarily well with Paul’s resurrection argument:
“The last enemy to be destroyed is death.”
—1 Corinthians 15:26
And:
“Death is swallowed up in victory.”
—1 Corinthians 15:54
So the biblical story ends not merely with people escaping from the place of the dead, but with the abolition of the entire death-system itself.
I would therefore modify your final wording only slightly. Rather than saying the alternative is “simply non-existent,” which imports a philosophical category the biblical writers don’t normally use, I would put it in biblical language:
In the age to come there is no longer a realm of the dead because there are no longer any dead awaiting resurrection. Sheol/Hades has been emptied and abolished. Those granted life live incorruptibly in God’s renewed creation; those condemned undergo the “second death.” There is no third category of humans continuing indefinitely as the dead in Sheol.
That actually makes Revelation 20–21 especially powerful from the anthropology we’ve been examining. The Bible begins with humans becoming living nephesh from the dust; death reverses that condition and humanity returns to the dust; Sheol is the domain of humanity in death; resurrection reverses death; and finally even Sheol itself disappears because God has permanently eliminated death.
The goal isn’t ultimately going somewhere when you die.
It’s the day when there is nowhere for the dead to go—because death itself no longer exists.
I then asked:
This point by you was very helpful:
“In the age to come there is no longer a realm of the dead because there are no longer any dead awaiting resurrection.”
In order for any “dead” to exist, there then must be a resurrection in their future (to life or judgement). Therefore, biblically speaking, if there is not resurrection, there is neither life nor judgement, and there is no pre-resurrection realm (Sheol)?
ChatGPT response:
Yes. I think you’ve identified an important implication of the biblical resurrection framework, with one adjustment in terminology: Sheol is meaningful precisely because death is temporary in God’s purposes. It is the realm of the dead awaiting God’s resolution of death, rather than their eternal destination.
Consider Daniel 12:2:
“Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.”
That gives a remarkably simple sequence:
living → dead/in the dust → resurrection → life or judgment
Jesus uses essentially the same structure in John 5:28–29: those who are “in the tombs” hear his voice and come out, either to a “resurrection of life” or a “resurrection of judgment.”
And Revelation 20 completes the picture. Death and Hades contain the dead only until they give them up (Rev 20:13). Once resurrection and judgment have occurred, Death and Hades themselves are destroyed (20:14).
So your statement can be sharpened:
To be “dead” biblically is not a permanent category. The dead remain dead only until resurrection. Resurrection terminates the state of death: some are raised to the life of the age to come and others to judgment. Once resurrection and judgment are complete, there is no longer any need for Sheol/Hades because there are no longer any dead awaiting resurrection.
And this produces an interesting consequence for conditional immortality.
If someone undergoes the second death after resurrection (Rev 20:14–15), Scripture never says that person returns to Hades/Sheol. In fact, Hades has already been destroyed. So there is no post-judgment “realm of the dead” into which that person must continue existing.
That’s why I would distinguish “dead” from “destroyed in the second death.”
Before resurrection:
Death → Sheol/Hades → resurrection is still ahead.
After resurrection:
Resurrection → judgment → either incorruptible life OR second death.
And because Death and Hades themselves have been abolished, the second death cannot simply restart the first-death condition indefinitely.
This also makes Paul’s statement unusually precise:
“The last enemy to be destroyed is death.”
—1 Corinthians 15:26
If people remained eternally dead somewhere after judgment, death would in an important sense still have subjects. Revelation instead pictures Death itself being destroyed.
So I think your insight can be condensed into a very useful proposition:
Sheol exists because resurrection is still future. Once there is no future resurrection, there is no Sheol—only life or the finality of the second death.
That seems very compatible with the larger biblical movement from dust → living nephesh → death/dust → resurrection → final life or final judgment.
I then asked:
Didn’t Paul also address the implications of what reality devoid of resurrection implies?
Yes—very explicitly. 1 Corinthians 15 is probably Paul’s strongest statement of exactly that implication. And it fits remarkably well with the framework you’re developing.
Paul asks us to imagine precisely the hypothetical you’re describing: What would reality look like if there were no resurrection of the dead?
In 1 Corinthians 15:16–18:
“For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised… Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.”
That last statement is crucial. Paul does not say, “If there is no resurrection, believers will simply remain with Christ in heaven forever.” He says that without resurrection, those who have died have perished (apōlonto, ἀπώλοντο).
Then in v. 19:
“If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied.”
Paul’s logic
His argument appears to run something like this:
No resurrection of the dead
→ Christ wasn’t raised (vv. 13, 16)
→ Christian faith is futile (v. 17)
→ those who died in Christ have perished (v. 18)
→ Christian hope therefore extends no further than this present life (v. 19).
And then Paul reverses the hypothetical:
“But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.” (v. 20)
That is significant because firstfruits necessarily anticipates what follows. Christ’s resurrection guarantees the resurrection of those belonging to him:
“For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ.” (vv. 22–23)
So Paul’s hope for the dead is located specifically at resurrection at Christ’s coming.
This strengthens your previous observation
If we combine Paul’s argument with Daniel 12, John 5, and Revelation 20, we get a remarkably consistent structure:
Present life → death / sleep / Sheol-Hades → resurrection → judgment → life of the age to come or second death
And Paul’s hypothetical asks: What happens if you remove resurrection from that sequence?
His answer is striking:
Perishing.
There is no alternative eternal existence offered in 1 Corinthians 15 to compensate for the absence of resurrection.
That makes 1 Corinthians 15:18 especially important for the anthropology we’ve been discussing. If Paul’s anthropology were fundamentally, “The person is an immortal soul that continues consciously with God regardless of whether the body is ever raised,” his statement that deceased Christians have “perished” if there is no resurrection becomes considerably harder to explain.
It doesn’t by itself prove every aspect of conditional immortality—someone could argue that Paul regards disembodied existence as incomplete rather than nonexistent—but Paul’s actual argument unquestionably places the Christian hope of overcoming death in resurrection, not in permanent disembodied survival.
And that brings us right back to your formulation:
In order for “the dead” to have a future, there must be resurrection.
Paul essentially performs that thought experiment in 1 Corinthians 15 and concludes:
No resurrection → the dead have perished. Resurrection → death is defeated.
Which makes his conclusion in 15:54–55 perfectly appropriate: it is when the dead are raised incorruptible that the saying becomes true:
“Death is swallowed up in victory.”
Death isn’t finally defeated when someone dies and goes somewhere.
Death is defeated when the dead are raised.
It makes me think of this:
Revelation 21:4 (HCSB)
He will wipe away every tear from their eyes.
Death will no longer exist;
grief, crying, and pain will exist no longer,
because the previous things have passed away.
Godspeed, to the brethren!
Check out my book!
theidolbabbler.com 